Text

Entrepreneurs Collapse The Wave Function

I’ve come to a satisfying analogy when it comes to an important core-skill of entrepreneurs.  True entrepreneurs collapse the wave function.

I am a physicist by training.  But long before I ever studied Physics at the University of Leeds I was gripped by quantum mechanics.  The picture of the world painted by quantum mechanics, and verified to incredible levels of precision, is famously counter-intuitive.  

In quantum mechanics everything exists in all possible states at the same time.  One represents everything, even the reader, by a “wave function” which takes into account all of these possible states.  It’s only when one takes a measurement that anything takes on a single observable value.  This observation itself “collapses the wave function” from a particle being in all possible states simultaneously into being in one specific observable state.  The example of Schrodinger’s cat is often trotted out here, the poor beast trapped in a box, subjected to a random event that can either kill or not kill the cat, causing it to exist in a peculiar limbo until the box is open and the dead/notdead cat is observed.

As we work on the rapid iteration of AppWhirl, in six broad cycles making up two core themes - optimizing for virality and optimizing for economics - it occurs to me just how much uncertainty entrepreneurs juggle with.  I have to manage this complex picture when presenting to prospective investors.  The further out one goes in the strategic plan, the more uncertainty there is, because with so much uncertainty there are many many branching points in the decision tree.  This leads to quasi-chaotic levels of uncertainty.  

Non-entrepreneurs, coming into start-ups from the safer environs of “big-corporate” are often paralyzed by this.

Again I use a physicists understanding of the word chaotic - as in complex systems.  And in complex systems there are still often broad patterns.  Chaotic is not the same as random.  It’s these patterns those much-maligned VCs attempt to discern from the countless pitches they endure day-in day-out.  More importantly true entrepreneurs have vision, they see these patterns, identify the trend lines, ride on the tides of the future.  This is why it is so important for an entrepreneur to have big picture view, a deep understanding of where the space in which they are iterating is going.  

One thing that concerns me about some folks practicing the “lean startup” approach, as we are at AppWhirl, is they seem to conflate lean startup with small ideas.  FNACs.  Lean startup doesn’t mean small vision.   It is merely a set of techniques and methods to manage the uncertainty and de-risk the business prior to ramping for scale.  Identify the product/market fit using rapid iteration and robust customer development.  Where appropriate focus on the viral coefficient and generating a viral feedback loop.  Ensure your economics work - first in principle, then in practice, finally at scale.  

As one looks out to the future, and how one’s product will impact the market… as we look out from AppWhirl at how our vision can change the world, disrupt a multi-billion dollar industry, and build a company that truly matters on a global scale… the further out one looks from today the fuzzier the details of that future are.  The wave function that represents the evolution of the company stretches out.  I can see where it goes, broadly.  M y job as an entrepreneur, as founder & CEO, is to keep options open through cycles of iteration.  Don’t assume I am smarter than the market and instead listen to what customers are saying.  But when the time is right it falls to me to collapse that wave function.  Fast.  To make  a decision.  To settle on one path to the future for one particular milestone.  Then to start all over again.  Make sure my feet are still firmly on the ground then look ahead again, where once more the uncertain, fuzzy path reaches out to the horizon.  

Employees and investors are not subatomic quantum particles.  They need to exist with a degree of certainty in order to gain confidence in your vision and your ability to deliver on it.  Don’t sweat the decisions you’ve made.  Look up and see how many more are in front of you on the tree of possible options.  If you don’t get one right the opportunity will be ahead to course correct.  

But you cannot keep all  your options open forever.  You have to make your path.  You must keep collapsing the wave function.

It is what makes life what it is.

Text

The week in VC Blogs: week 8 2010 Feb 21st-27th

This is a summary of VC blog posts (wk 8 2010) based on my list of active VC bloggers - see here or http://www.google.com/reader/shared/richarddjordan (any recommendations for addition welcomed).

Sunday 21st February 2010

Brad Feld gave over a post to a friend of his in the legal world, on the topic of software patents.  He later wrote about his thoughts in Vivek Wadha’s TechCrunch post on the topic of women in tech, in a post titled “things women entrepreneurs can learn from Indian entrepreneurs”.

David Hornik defended TED against the elitism label.

Mark Suster talks about his investment thesis that advertising wants to be measured, and where this leads him in terms of investments.  Hard to disagree with that.

In a post on a topic close to my heart, Fred Wilson pointed us to his slides for his upcoming presentation to the Future of Web Apps conference, “The Ten Golden Principles For Successful Web Apps”.

Monday 22nd February 2010

Roger Ehrenberg over at Information Arbitrage asks whether or not Derivatives are the real problem.  He follows advice to CTO/Founders not to let the BizGuy/Founder screw everything up.

Naval from VentureHacks believes, as do I, that the iPad is an important step forwards, and talks about why.

Seth Levine popped in on the debate around charging companies to pitch.

Charlie O’Donnell highlighted job openings in First Round Capital’s portfolio companies and followed up with this week in NYC innovation.

Brad Feld passed on a suggestion from one of his commenters, about escalating patent fees as a solution to the mess of problems surrounding software patents.  He also posted a reminder to entrepreneurs to show not tell when pitching VCs.

Fred Wilson’s MBA Monday this week focused on the types of corporate entity entrepreneurs have in front of them as options for starting a business.

Tuesday 23rd February 2010

David Cowan posted another in his series on TED talks.

Fred Wilson opines on audio advertising and how it’s likely to be as big online as it has been off, once the model gets worked out.

Brad Feld continued his “Letters to my Dad” blogging with a post titled “When I decided not to become a doctor”.

Mark Suster continued being able to prompt me to feel like I have to comment with another great article, this time about channel building. My thoughts here.

Seth Levine outlined the upcoming VCIR conference.

Charlie O’Donnell rounded off the day with an anecdote about a turndown.  I usually enjoy Charlie’s writing but I have to say if I’d been turned down by a VC in this manner I’d have probably felt more than a little patronized and likely been pretty pissed off.  That being said I don’t know the rest of the story and the turn-down-ee might have been a complete muppet oblivious to the points Charlie raises.

Wednesday 24th February 2010

Fred Wilson opened the day (the advantages of an East Coast schedule in the world of VC blogging) with a teaser about Extension.fm then only 50 invites - yeah I didn’t get one, d’oh!

Brad Feld wrote on the very promising news about the Kerry/Lugar bill which followers of the startup visa movement will be happy about.  Next stop - doing something about Software Patents!  He then posted about the recent WSJ writeup of his portfolio company PogoPlug.

Thursday 25th February 2010

Fred Wilson followed up on Brad’s note with some thoughts on software patents.

Fred Destin - a personal favourite who blogs occasionally - introduced us to what he calls Venture Capital 2.1.  

Brad Feld shared with us a Twitter Widget for those who wish to express support for the Startup Visa movement. 

Larry Cheng talks through the sources of money for VC firms, for entrepreneurs who may not know this already.  Nice summary.  

Mark Suster links to one of my favourite movies scenes of all time for anyone interested in any form of sales ABC: Always Be Selling.  (Any entrepreneur should have seen Glengarry Glen Ross and Boiler Room IMHO.)  His point being that time is the enemy of deals

Jeff Bussgang sort of defends anecdotal selling - mother-in-law market research

Friday 26th February 2010

Fred Wilson talks leverages the Facebook patent as an opportunity to talk software patents.  He is substantially calmer than Jason Calcanis’ recent commentary on the topic for those who listened to this week’s “This Week In Startups” podcast.  However he’s not a fan.  

Charlie O’Donnell gives us a rundown of the latest on the FRC key hire wire - a must read if you’re looking for startup jobs.  His second post of the day was on “Sleeper agents of Innovation” within big companies. 

Brad Feld linked to a CNBC interview of Dick Lugar talking Startup Visas. http://bit.ly/9Dsc5K 

Naval from VentureHacks engaged in some naked self-promotion - and why not?  It’s Business Week! 

Saturday 27th February 2010

We close out with Fred Wilson talking about Entrepreneurship and Social Change.

Chris Dixon challenges the East Coast / West coast binary view and points out that we just need to make more places like Silicon Valley, period. Now we can all get behind the idea of no VC Tupacs or Biggie-smalls… probably.  Roger Ehrenberg took issue with Chris and wrote his own opinion on the topic.  

Brad Feld discovered what many of us have been saying for a while - real people don’t care about browsers - most don’t even know what one is even though they probably use on every day!  

Religion rounds off the week - and two posts I had to comment on.  The first was Larry Cheng stretching to make some biblical quotes and sermon notes fit the world of busines.  It’s always a painful process to watch and IMHO adds little value, when people do that.  Not a fan. 

Secondly, Mark Suster talks about the religious side-taking in the debate around nature vs. nurture in entrepreneurialism.  Vivek Wadha’s TechCrunch post (which was just the worst kind of pseudo-science article we see nowadays) sparked his ire.  So, let me settle it - it’s 80% nature, now can we move on?  Have a nice week.

For last week see “The week in VC Blogs: week 7 2010

Text

Bootstrapping Christmas - an entrepreneur’s tale

So, when you start a company and you’re trying to build something really special but in a disciplined Lean-Startup/MVP/CustomerDevelopment kind of way, you spend long periods unpaid.  Perhaps another post for another time is to discuss financial planning for an entrepreneurial career, including strategies for periods of both feast and famine.

That means being careful with the family budget when it comes to things like Christmas.  I guess I have been hearing a lot of fellow entrepreneurs bitching about unpaid periods recently and should add this to a series called “quit bitching or quit startups”.  Well, I’m an entrepreneur, but far more important than that, I’m a dad.  This Christmas Ethan, who’s an airplane nut, wanted “a Huge Airport”.  Not just an airport.  Nuh-uh.  A Huge Airport.  This is the story, in pictures (click on picture for full size version), of that huge airport, and how I bootstrapped Christmas:

1.  First I went to a website (cannot find the link now) of an airplane enthusiast where I downloaded a set of airport plans in PDF.  I printed out each element.

2.  Then came the painful task of cutting out each piece - literally (my neck and back ached after hours of doing this).  This had to be done with some precision.

3. I laid out all the pieces on the table to make sure it’d all fit together properly

4. Foam board was sourced from the local hobby shop and in a very messy process I glued each piece to the right spot

5. I tried spray lacquer and it was a disaster - by the next morning every piece had lifted from the baord as the lacquer dried and was strong enough at curling the edges to overpower the glue. So after a second gluing session I went with outdoor brush-on varnish. That worked so it was on with the modelers grass.

6. Voila. One huge airport.

7. Being enjoyed on Christmas morning.

8. In it’s place in Ethan’s bedroom.

9. “Look Daddy, Singapore Airlines taking off!”